Wednesday, October 7, 2020
Accurate Fever Scanning with Infrared Forehead Thermometers: Issues, Solutions and How to Calibrate
Saturday, September 19, 2020
Scott Gottlieb Lets Trump off Woodward's Hook
Former FDA Leader Says Trump Was Right
Trump did the best with the information he had at the time.Saturday, August 1, 2020
Far-UVC light (222 nm) and human coronaviruses
Together with previous safety studies12,13,14,15,16,17,18 and our earlier studies with aerosolized influenza A (H1N1)23, these results suggest the utility of continuous low-dose-rate far-UVC light in occupied indoor public locations such as hospitals, transportation vehicles, restaurants, airports and schools, potentially representing a safe and inexpensive tool to reduce the spread of airborne-mediated viruses. While staying within the current regulatory dose limits, low-dose-rate far-UVC exposure can potentially safely provide a major reduction in the ambient level of airborne coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2.
Read the full article online at:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-67211-2Monday, July 20, 2020
Gov. Wolf’s actions are a "stunning act of petty revenge..."
Claims Rep. Frank Ryan's Op-Ed: "Gov. Wolf should not inflict harm on those he represents"
Friday, June 19, 2020
CoVIg-19 Plasma Alliance
What Is CoVIg-19?
Wednesday, June 17, 2020
New Online Course - Elevated Skin Temperature Screening
For more details and to register, visit: https://irtraining.asentialms.com/catalog/?type=course&sc=EST
The Infrared Training Center's (ITC) training will increase your credibility, enhance your career, and build your thermal imaging business. ITC offers IR training, certification, and recertification in all aspects of thermography. It is a unit of FLIR Systems.
Tuesday, June 9, 2020
AMETEK Land Releases Technology to Help Contain Threat of COVID-19
AMETEK Land's fever screening thermal imaging system designed for human body temperature measurement
The vIRalert 2 fixed thermal imaging system provides a remote surface measurement of body temperature, automatically alerting the operator to elevated temperatures.
This proven technology calibrates the thermal image with a blackbody calibration source in real-time to provide a system "accuracy*" of better than 0.5 °C and can therefore detect even small temperature changes induced by a fever.
As a result, the vIRalert 2 system provides reliable skin temperature measurement for screening at point-of-entry into key facilities, like offices, factories, warehouses, schools, government buildings and any other places where infectious diseases can easily spread.
David Primhak, Director of Development and Product Management at AMETEK Land, explains: “In a world where global travel means infections can pass through populations fast, the ability to screen people for fever is a key tool in reducing the risk of disease spread. vIRalert 2 can detect fever at point-of-entry quickly and remotely, in compliance with social distancing requirements, preventing the risk of infection being transmitted between the operator and members of the public. This is cutting edge technology that could make a huge difference in protecting the population both now and in the future.”
He adds: "Many thermal imagers are unable to achieve the sensitivity required to detect a fever and therefore give false positive readings and low detection percentages – this means a higher chance of spreading the infection throughout the monitored area. vIRalert 2 provides traceable readings, giving mission critical operations the confidence to operate normally and safely."
AMETEK Land’s vIRalert 2 system provides on-screen and audible alerts when a pedestrian with an elevated temperature is detected, allowing simple decision making on whether a person should be further vetted for admission without slowing pedestrian flow.
Quick and easy to install, vIRalert 2 is simple to operate and works straight out of the box. It also has an automatic alert function, which reduces the potential for human error.
* Accuracy is a term used by many instrument makers to imply the preciseness of their measurement devices. It is a qualitative term much like "beautiful" and "rugged"and is technically equivalent to saying "good". The technically correct, quantitative term is "Measurement Uncertainty" that indicates the measurement capability or precision, usually under calibration conditions, in numbers along with a confidence values. Land Instrument's and its predecessor, Land Pyrometers, Ltd. used to provide such detail with all their measurement devices.
Monday, June 1, 2020
Climate risks & COVID-19 pandemic
Nature Climate Change May 15, 2020:
https://www.nature.com/nclimate“Immediate steps can be taken to minimize climate-attributable loss of life, but climate adaptation also needs a long-term strategy for pandemic preparedness.“
Authors
Phillips, C.A., Caldas, A., Cleetus, R. et al. “Compound climate risks in the COVID-19 pandemic”. Nat. Clim. Chang. (2020).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0804-2
Download citation
Wednesday, May 20, 2020
COVID Senior Deaths in US ~80% Of Total
COVID-19 Deaths Scary to This Senior
As a retiree, and a Senior, I am concerned that our leaders and media are either inept or deliberately trying to hide the true magnitude of the disaster that COVID-19 is taking on the Senior demographic. Here’s a few stats that I could find without too much digging, thanks to the links on the worldometers.info website.
From these data it is not a very far reach to conclude that Senior deaths make up about 80% or more of the total number of deaths reported to date. Am I wrong, or has this fact been subtlety hidden from the populous?
Both items are very scary, indeed! I suspect that most people including Seniors have a feeling that the number is about 50%, not the really dramatic and scary value of 80%! That’s more than 2/3rds of total deaths!!
Why, in heavens name, would State enumerators not analyze the data by age when there are analyses by all sorts of things like race, county and more? There is no uniformity to reporting and some states do a far more competent job than others.
Note please, that the percentages shown below are of the total number reported COVID-19 attributed deaths for each reporting unit. In some cases there was no breakout of deaths for people over 65 years age and, the number I used is half the reported number for between 60 and 69. That’s probably conservative since it is most likely that there are more deaths above 65 than below.
Pennsylvania: NR*
Average of reported and credible sample data: 81%
___________________
- *Not Reported
- ** Not Reported, not analyzed rest home data available, clearly under reported
- ***Not Reported, some rest home data mentioned, no other
1. The “News” Media does not have a clue, they seem to focus on the obvious and do not go any further like asking some thoughtful questions of those in charge about the meaning of lop-sided demographics of deaths in terms of treatments options, options in opening the economy and development of plans to better protect the vulnerable to make opening easier and sooner.
2. From the onset of the crisis there have been generic warnings about those who are vulnerable, but little beyond, again, vague generalities of washing hands and avoiding contact, There has nothing promoted about efforts to seriously impress the gravity of the situation on Seniors over 65!
3. Despite massive government efforts to develop antivirals and vaccines, there has been no mention, at least I haven’t heard any, about efforts to improve the immune systems of the most vulnerable people in the country, the ones who make up more than 80% of deaths, thus far. Are there medicinals, vitamins or some new pharmaceutical approach that could help? (My personal observation is that there are hardly any Vitamin C tablets available at CVS, Costco or other stores and even very slow delivery from Amazon online. Some people obviously believe in Vitamin C! Thanks to Dr Linus Pauling, a double Nobel Prize awardee, I am a fan; his arguments in his book, “Vitamin C and The Common Cold”, were very convincing to me. )
4. Seems to me that Seniors including those on Medicare should be receiving more urgent warnings and support to keep away from outside contacts and made aware of how truly serious the hazard is to them.
PostNote:
In a corrected report, March 18th, on morbidity and mortality, the CDC actually reported that 80% of COVID-19 deaths were among the 65 and older age group, yet I never heard any report in the media about it and it is buried in Internet search results. See: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6912e2-H.pdf
Looks like the very high percentage of deaths from COVID-19 for those older than 65 holds true for Sweden, too. According to the data online at https://www.statista.com/statistics/1107913/number-of-coronavirus-deaths-in-sweden-by-age-groups/, as of May 20, the percentage is 91.7%.
In April, Metro news in the U.K. estimated that about 82.3% of COVID-19 deaths was among those over age 65. See https://metro.co.uk/2020/04/03/coronavirus-deaths-age-uk-12506448/.
Increasing the accuracy of your temperature measurements.
Monitor Newsletter at Windmill Software ( https://www.windmill.co.uk/ ) regularly publishes useful articles related to measurement, control,...





